Accounts

Boost your Profitability by using quality Management Accounts

In our 25 years of experience we often take on clients with issues, often unknown, surrounding their management accounts.

If you’re serious about improving you profitability then naturally you’ll ensure that you receive promptly, every month, the key information, both financial and non financial, that you need to run your business effectively and efficiently.

This isn’t what your accountant gives you in their format or what you’ve inherited. It’s what you and your team or Board have determined that you need. You’ve really got to "own" it otherwise you risk not extracting the most benefit from the potentially precious information.

Some issues are obvious and easy to identify such as just no management accounts or they’re far too late or of poor quality. What tends not to be obvious or even admitted are personal user ‘difficulties’ around the table. These broadly fall into two categories. The first is a simple lack of understanding of what the numbers mean and what action consequently should be taken. The second is in accepting a sub standard form of reporting, perhaps assuming, probably wrongly, that it can’t be changed or that such would be too expensive. 

A sub optimal reporting scenario is a shame but it’s worse than that. It’s potentially costing serious money if management decisions are being delayed or prevented because of the lack of quality MI. The funny thing is that, in our experience, most issues mentioned are pretty straightforward to deal with and are well worth considering. 

Beware - it’s not a good idea to carry on with the same reporting that you inherit without reviewing as to whether or not it’s fit for your purpose. Circumstances may have changed over time so that the reporting needs adjusting but this won’t happen automatically. 

Of course this applies equally to charities where arguably it’s even more important to have the MI and understand it as Trustees are personally responsible. 

One of the most profitable developments in a reporting system is to split the single Profit & Loss report between different parts of the business such as in BookCheck where we report separately on each of Bookkeeping with Management Accounts and Payroll. They’re different businesses with different margins. If they’re mixed together in one, whilst you can still tell the sales performance, you don’t know which is improving its margin profitability and which is not – there’s no way of telling.

Perhaps the most difficult obstacles to overcome is for a user to admit a lack of understanding. To a certain extent that’s down to the service provider checking, asking, hinting or otherwise. But it’s mostly down to the individual getting real. 

Quality Management accounts should be a terrific basis for boosting the profitability and hence value of the business so our advice is - don’t waste the opportunity. 

Were UK Bank accounts presenting a True & Fair picture?

The UK accounting watchdog, the Financial Reporting Council, is all set to review the bookkeeping of the big banks following the crisis of 2007 - 2009.

Last year I had a meeting with a very senior person in the Bank of England. I said that as an accountant who qualified with Coopers & Lybrand, now PWC, I was puzzled that no-one had yet sued the Big 4 accountants after they had signed off all the bank accounts with no qualifications - a totally clean bill of health. I suggested that the only sensible reason was that they were, like the banks, too big to fail.

This review will start in a few months and it's conclusions will be interesting, to say the least.

At our end it's no doubt a lot easier, nevertheless we still follow the cardinal principle of being able to understand and validate everything in the Balance Sheet. I do wonder how many auditors or indeed banks really did understand what the numbers represented?

Anthony Pilkington, Managing Director, BookCheck Ltd

This entry was posted in Accounting, Business Development and tagged in Accounts, Bookkeeping, Balance Sheet by bookchadmin